Jump to content

Talk:Key generator

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Cryptography: Computer science Low-importance
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

Merge

[edit]

I would like to merge Key generator and Keygen with sufficient information to disambiguate the two uses of the term. Key generator needs more useful information, and Keygen is an article in great need of work. Comments or suggestions --BSD Daemon (talk) 05:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Keygen. Short version: No. Zetawoof(z) 07:32, 15 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was going to propose combining this with another page about cryptography or public key encryption, but I think that what this page really needs is: more sources, more info and more links to the rest of Wikipedia. For instance, do we have links from the cryptographic systems that use key generators pointing back here? KonigProbst (talk) 17:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blather

[edit]

The section "Significance" contains meaningless blather. Probably copied from some very basic online tutorial to the idea of cryptographic keys.

If you can't merge this with keygen, maybe cross-link them? I was looking for "key generator" (don't ask why :-) and it turns out the definition I needed was "keygen"...

Gvanrossum (talk) 04:14, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I had similar concerns about the section and marked it with {{tone}}, but after noticing this existing discussion, I went ahead and removed it in Special:Diff/1178477670. DefaultFree (talk) 22:41, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]