Dark Mode

Skip to content

Navigation Menu

Sign in
Appearance settings

Search code, repositories, users, issues, pull requests...

Provide feedback

We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Sign up
Appearance settings

Software Release CAIP#238

Open
null-ref-ex wants to merge 2 commits intoChainAgnostic:mainfrom
null-ref-ex:master
Open

Software Release CAIP#238
null-ref-ex wants to merge 2 commits intoChainAgnostic:mainfrom
null-ref-ex:master

Conversation

Copy link

null-ref-ex commented Jul 25, 2023

A proposal on how we can lay a solid foundation for requesting chain software information alongside a standard data structure for response payloads. The hope is that this can lay a foundation on which systems can be built that address ongoing issues for node runners and validator operators know about and automatically executing on software release events.

null-ref-ex added 2 commits July 25, 2023 14:31
A proposal on how we can lay a solid foundation for requesting chain software information alongside a standard data structure for response payloads.
The hope is that this can lay a foundation on which systems can be built that address ongoing issues for node runners and validator operators know about and automatically executing on software release events.
Copy link
Collaborator

bumblefudge commented Aug 2, 2023

Hey sorry I'm a little lost on context here. Is this Ethereum-specific? Would it make sense to try to get support for this in, say, the AllCoreDevs discord of the Ethereum Foundation if so, or in the equivalent repo/community forum where protocol upgrades are designed and aligned in some other namespace first, and then bring a generalized v2 back afterwards with some implementer feedback and lessons learned?

Copy link
Author

null-ref-ex commented Aug 4, 2023

It is not ethereum specific, the problem exists in every network as far as I've experienced.
I was hoping to use this process to establish a well thought out and constructed standard on which implementations can be built.

bumblefudge reacted with thumbs up emoji

Copy link
Collaborator

bumblefudge commented Aug 7, 2023

OK! Is there anything similar implemented in the wild that this is an improvement on? Or do you know of other VMs/ecosystems/"namespaces" that have a use-case for this and are interested in specifying it before or after implementing? If you look in the open PRs, there are a few other, similar ideas (many of them authored by me!) which are similarly waiting for an implementer-champion, because we prefer not to specify pure greenfield at CASA, so much as things that at least 1, preferably 2 independent implementations are at least softly-commited to taking to production...

Copy link
Author

null-ref-ex commented Aug 7, 2023

Sounds good! I'll take a look through and see what I can find.
Do you have any time to have a conversation online? I'd love to understand everything better so I can be a more constructive contributor along with my team.

bumblefudge reacted with thumbs up emoji

Copy link
Collaborator

bumblefudge commented Aug 7, 2023 *
edited
Loading

absolutely! feel free to book something at cal.com/ and bring as much or as little of your team as you think would be constructive

Copy link
Collaborator

bumblefudge commented Aug 9, 2023

absolutely! feel free to book something at cal.com/ and bring as much or as little of your team as you think would be constructive

whoops my cal.com was misconfigured and swallowing requests without throwing, if you already made an appointment it was lost. could I ask you to try again if so?

thakhin12346 approved these changes Aug 21, 2023
bumblefudge mentioned this pull request Sep 28, 2023
6 tasks
bumblefudge mentioned this pull request Oct 26, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

bumblefudge commented Nov 23, 2023

@null-ref-ex any progress here? i'll be in US time zones starting in 2 weeks so glad to take any joint calls with partners that are curious about the idea. apologies that I forgot about this and didn't ask around at Devconnect like I hoped to!

bumblefudge mentioned this pull request Nov 23, 2023
bumblefudge mentioned this pull request Dec 21, 2023
Copy link
Collaborator

bumblefudge commented Jan 18, 2024

bumblefudge mentioned this pull request Jan 18, 2024
Copy link

mozz30-tech commented May 24, 2024

A proposal on how we can lay a solid foundation for requesting chain software information alongside a standard data structure for response payloads. The hope is that this can lay a foundation on which systems can be built that address ongoing issues for node runners and validator operators know about and automatically executing on software release events.

mozz30-tech approved these changes May 24, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

2 more reviewers

mozz30-tech mozz30-tech approved these changes

thakhin12346 thakhin12346 approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements

At least 2 approving reviews are required to merge this pull request.

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants