User talk:ComplexRational/Archive 16

I attempted to add a new criteria for Template:CSD summary, the LLMs. I believe I've written the code correctly and the category certainly gets populated, but for some reason the # of current members doesn't ever include a quantity. Can you show me what I've clearly missed? BusterD (talk) 12:36, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

@BusterD: It looks like there was an extra "Category:" prefix, which is already implicitly included in {{PAGESINCAT}}. I removed it and it seems to work now. Cheers, ^Complex/_Rational 15:20, 29 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I would like to request the undeletion of this page. The page was recently deleted on the ground of notability. There is a full-length monograph on the subject published by Sahitya Akademi, India's National Academy of Letters, which is enough to establish notability. Can you please move the article to draftspace so I can work on it? --Gazal world (talk) 19:49, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

@Gazal world: I've undeleted the page and moved it to Draft:Narhar Ambadas Kurundkar, where you can work on it and add additional sources (which were not found during the AfD) that may demonstrate notability. ^Complex/_Rational 22:31, 30 December 2025 (UTC)

Thank you very much, ComplexRational. --Gazal world (talk) 18:42, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I think this revision needs to be deleted under RD2 as an unsourced BLP violation. Thanks, ScalarFactor (talk) 01:22, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

@ScalarFactor: I don't believe this falls within the purview of RD2: although it violates WP:BLPCRIME, some reliable sources do exist, and they are not grossly misrepresented in a manner that is insulting or degrading. On the other hand, some source material was copied verbatim, so I've deleted under RD1. ^Complex/_Rational 01:55, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for handling that - I had only seen the first unsourced edition, not the later additions from the TA when making this request. Hope you're having a good new year. ScalarFactor (talk) 01:57, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

Happy 2026 to you as well! ^Complex/_Rational 04:23, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

Happy new year! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:18, 2 January 2026 (UTC)

@Gerda Arendt: Thank you, and happy new year to you too! ^Complex/_Rational 04:24, 3 January 2026 (UTC)

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 6 January 2026 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2025).

Guideline and policy news

• All general sanctions imposed by the community may now be enforced at the Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard (WP:AE) as a result of a recent RfC.
• Due to the result of a recent RFC, the administrator recall process is amended to extend the deadline for a re-request for adminship to 30 days or the next administrator election, whichever is later.
• Changes to the Access to Temporary Account IP Addresses Policy's disclosure rules include broadening the consecutive-blocks exception to cover all admin actions and removing the requirement to revision-delete permissible disclosures once they become unnecessary (instead requiring only their removal). See WP:TAIVDISCLOSE for more information.

Arbitration

• Following the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been elected to the Arbitration Committee: Aoidh, Asilvering, Girth Summit, Guerillero, HJ Mitchell, HouseBlaster, Izno, Sdrqaz, SilverLocust.
• The arbitration case Pbsouthwood has been suspended.

Hello, I am writing to kindly request a reconsideration of the deleted Blooket Wiki article. The article included reliable sources for citation. Several references came from well-established and trusted wiki platforms, including major Fandom wikis that are commonly used as secondary sources for online game documentation. Because of the use of recognized wiki references and proper sourcing, I believe the article meets basic citation standards. I respectfully request that you review the article again and consider undeleting it. Hosterr (talk) 12:00, 16 January 2026 (UTC)

@Hosterr: The deletion discussion resulted in a unanimous consensus for deletion. Sources such as Fandom are user-generated and not considered among reliable sources for demonstrating notability. Reliable sources must be published by organizations with a reputation for fact-checking and must not be affiliated with the subject; moreover, no number of unreliable sources can compensate for the absence of reliable ones. As such, I will not undelete the article, and I must advise you that a recreated version will very likely be deleted on the same grounds. Let me know if you have any other questions. ^Complex/_Rational 21:21, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Every content about blooket on entire web is uses generated and fan created content. Is there any solution for this ? Hosterr (talk) 03:05, 18 January 2026 (UTC)

In that case - if there is no significant coverage about Blooket in independent, reliable sources - Wikipedia is not the appropriate place for an article about it. ^Complex/_Rational 22:38, 18 January 2026 (UTC)