Jump to content

Bosniakisation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Process of cultural assimilation in parts of southern Europe

Bosniakisation designates the process of ethnic and cultural assimilation of non-Bosniak individuals or groups into the Bosniak ethnocultural corpus. Historically, bosniakisation was directed mainly towards some other South Slavic groups, like ethnic Muslims (Muslimani) in former Yugoslavia.[1] Since Bosniaks are Sunni Muslims, Bosniakisation was also manifested towards some distinctive ethnoreligious minorities within Serbian and Croatian national corpus, mainly towards Serbian Muslims and Croatian Muslims. The process had its peak in 1993, when the Bosnian Muslim political leadership adopted the Bosniak name.

History

[edit]

This process was initiated in Bosnia and Herzegovina, originally during the period of Austro-Hungarian administration (1878-1918), when the first political projects were designed to create an integral "Bosnian", and then a special "Bosniak" nation. An integral "Bosnian" project proved to be unachievable even during the Austro-Hungarian administration, as not only the Bosnian Serbs but also the Bosnian Croats offered determined resistance to the creation of an integral "Bosnian" nation. Therefore, the focus shifted to a special "Bosniak" project, which gained a firm foothold in the Bosnian-Herzegovinian government. The key role in the design and implementation of these projects was played by Austro-Hungarian Minister Benjamin Kalai, who from 1882 to 1903 was responsible for Bosnia and Herzegovina.[2]

As a foothold for Bosniak ethnogenesis and history, Bogomilism and a non-Slavic origin had been contrived. Then, after the direct influence of the Ottoman Conquest, a cultural identity was imposed (through the process of Islamization). This gave to the ultimate expression of a Bosniak specificity, which has led to the religious doctrine of ethnos. The Bosniak project was restarted at the time of the breakup of Yugoslavia, when Yugoslavian Muslims decided to rename themselves ethnic "Bosniaks". This process initially affected much of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Then it spread to northeastern Montenegro and southwestern Serbia,[3] including the Raska region, as well as parts of Kosovo.

By the early 1990s, a vast majority of Bosnian Muslims identified as ethnic Muslims. According to a poll from 1990, only 1.8% of the citizens of Bosnia and Herzegovina supported the idea of a "Bosniak" national identity (by then already an essentially archaic term), while 17% considered the name to encompass all of the inhabitants of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Their main political party, the Party of Democratic Action, rejected the idea of Bosniak identity and managed to expel those who promoted it. The supporters of the Bosniak nationhood established their political party, the Muslim Bosniak Organisation, and received only 1.1% of the votes during the 1990 general election.[4] At the 1991 census, 1,496 people identified as Muslims-Bosniaks, 1,285 as Bosniaks and 876 as Bosniaks-Muslims, totalling to 3,657 or 0.08% of the total population.[5]

On 27 September 1993, however, after the leading political, cultural, and religious representatives of Bosnian Muslims held an assembly and at the same time when they rejected the Owen-Stoltenberg peace plan adopted the Bosniak name deciding to "return to our people their historical and national name of Bosniaks, to tie ourselves in this way for our country of Bosnia and its state-legal tradition, for our Bosnian language and all spiritual tradition of our history". The main reason for the SDA to adopt the Bosniak identity, only three years after expelling the supporters of the idea from their party ranks, was due to foreign policy considerations. One of the leading SDA figures Dzemaludin Latic, the editor of the official gazette of the party, commented on the decision stating that: "In Europe, he who doesn't have a national name, doesn't have a country" and that "we must be Bosniaks, that what we are, to survive in our country". The decision to adopt the Bosniak identity was primarily influenced by the change of opinion of the former communist intellectuals such as Atif Purivatra, Alija Isakovic and those who were a part of the pan-Islamists such as Rusmir Mahmutcehajic (who was a staunch opponent of Bosniak identity), all of whom saw the changing of the name to Bosniak as a way to connect the Bosnian Muslims to the country of Bosnia and Herzegovina.[6]

Bosniakisation was often manifested through cultural and educational programs. In 1996, the Atlantic Council of the United States noted that "Non-Muslims in Sarajevo, Tuzla, and other areas under Bosniak control feel increasingly alienated in their own communities as a result of a wide array of government decisions, from the "Bosniakization" of the school curriculum".[7] Specific forms of Bosniakisation were also integrated into linguistic policy,[8] and perception of regional history.[9][10]

Sandzak

[edit]

Sandzak is a very ethnically diverse region. Most Muslims declared themselves ethnic Muslims in the 1991 census. By the 2002-2003 census, however, most of them declared themselves Bosniaks. There is still a significant minority that identifies simply as Muslims (by ethnicity).

The second half of the 19th century was pivotal in shaping the current ethnic and political landscape in Sandzak. Austria-Hungary supported Sandzak's separation from the Ottoman Empire, or at least its autonomy within it. The reason was to prevent Serbia and Montenegro from unifying, and allow Austria-Hungary's further expansion to the Balkans. Per these plans, Sandzak was seen as part of Bosnia and Herzegovina, while its Muslim population played a significant role, giving Austrian-Hungarians a pretext for protecting the Muslim minority from the Christian Orthodox Serbs.[11]

There were a larger presence of Albanians in Sandzak in the past, however due to various factors such as migration, assimilation, along with mixing, many identify as Bosniaks instead.[12][13]

Insisting on the imposition of Bosniaks and the spreading of a Bosniak project outside of Bosnia, a controversy erupted on the part of Yugoslav ethnic Muslims primarily in Serbia and Montenegro. In opposing the imposition of Bosniaks, president of the Muslim Matica in Montenegro, Dr. Avdul Kurpejovic explicitly stressed in 2014 that the "Greater Bosniak Nationalist, Islamic Assimilation Program" is based exactly on the Islamic Declaration of Alija Izetbegovic.[14]

In 1700, after the Great Serb Migration, the Albanian Kelmendi and other Albanian tribes like the Shkreli of Rugova established themselves in the region of Rozaje and the neighboring town of Tutin in Serbia. The Shala, Krasniqi, and Gashi also moved into the region.[15][16][17] Starting in the 18th century many people originating from the Hoti tribe have migrated to and live in Sandzak, mainly in the Tutin area, but also in Sjenica.[18] Catholic Albanian groups which settled in Tutin in the early 18th century were converted to Islam in that period. Their descendants make up the large majority of the population of Tutin and the Pester plateau.[19]

Members of the Shkreli (known as Skrijelj /Serbian: Shkrijelj) and Kelmendi (known as Klimenti /Serbian: Klimenti) beginning around 1700 migrated into the lower Pester and Sandzak regions. The Kelmendi chief had converted to Islam, and promised to convert his people as well. A total of 251 Kelmendi households (1,987 people) were resettled in the Pester area on that occasion, however five years later a part of the exiled Kelmendi managed to fight their way back to their homeland, and in 1711 they sent out a large raiding force to bring back some other from Pester too.[20] The remaining Kelmendi and Shkreli converted to Islam and became Slavophones by the 20th century, and as of today they now self-identify as part of the Bosniak ethnicity, although in the Pester plateau they partly utilized the Albanian language until the middle of the 20th century. There are still some Albanian villages in the Pester region: Ugao, Borostica, Dolice and Gradac.[21] Factors such as some intermarriage undertaken by two generations with the surrounding (Muslim) Bosniak population along with the difficult circumstances of the Yugoslav wars (1990s) made local Albanians opt to refer to themselves in censuses as Bosniaks. Elders in the villages still have a degree of fluency in the language.[22]

The Slavic dialect of Gusinje and Plav (sometimes considered part of Sandzak) shows very high structural influence from Albanian. Its uniqueness in terms of language contact between Albanian and Slavic is explained by the fact that most Slavic-speakers in today's Plav and Gusinje are of Albanian origin.[23]

Gora

[edit]

A number of Gorani people were a subject of Bosniakisation in recent history.[24][page needed][25]

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Kurpejovic 2014.
  2. ^ Kraljacic 1987.
  3. ^ Chedomir Antitsh. "Savremeni srpsko-khrvatski odnosi". www.napredniklub.org.
  4. ^ Bougarel 2009, p. 125.
  5. ^ Etnicka obiljezja stanovnistva 1993, p. 10.
  6. ^ Bougarel 2009, p. 128.
  7. ^ Atlantic Council of the United States 1996.
  8. ^ Lehfeldt 1999, p. 89.
  9. ^ Dzaja 2002, p. 245.
  10. ^ Fetahagic 2020, p. 206.
  11. ^ Gorak-Sosnowska 2011, p. 329.
  12. ^ Banac, Ivo (2015-06-09). The National Question in Yugoslavia: Origins, History, Politics. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-1-5017-0194-8.
  13. ^ Malcolm, Noel (1998). Kosovo : a short history. Internet Archive. London : Macmillan. ISBN 978-0-333-66612-8.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: publisher location (link)
  14. ^ Avdul Kurpejovitsh (2014): Muslimani su natsionalna manjina
  15. ^ Musovic, Ejup (1985). Tutin i okolina. Serbian Academy of Science and Arts. p. 27.
  16. ^ The Tribes of Albania,: History, Culture and Society. Robert Elsie. 24 April 2015. p. 104. ISBN 9780857739322.
  17. ^ Kaser, Karl (1992). Hirten, Kampfer, Stammeshelden: Ursprunge und Gegenwart des balkanischen Patriarchats. Bohlau Verlag Wien. p. 163. ISBN 3205055454.
  18. ^ Biber, Ahmet. "HISTORIJAT RODOVA NA PODRUCJU BJELIMICA". Fondacija "Lijepa rijec". Archived from the original on 2020-02-21. Retrieved 2022-04-21.
  19. ^ Veljovic 2021, pp. 197-199.
  20. ^ Elsie 2015, p. 32.
  21. ^ Elsie, Robert (30 May 2015). The Tribes of Albania: History, Society and Culture. I.B.Tauris. p. 81. ISBN 978-1-78453-401-1.
  22. ^ Andrea Pieroni, Maria Elena Giusti, & Cassandra L. Quave (2011). "Cross-cultural ethnobiology in the Western Balkans: medical ethnobotany and ethnozoology among Albanians and Serbs in the Pester Plateau, Sandzak, South-Western Serbia." Human Ecology. 39.(3): 335. "The current population of the Albanian villages is partly "bosniakicised", since in the last two generations a number of Albanian males began to intermarry with (Muslim) Bosniak women of Pester. This is one of the reasons why locals in Ugao were declared to be "Bosniaks" in the last census of 2002, or, in Borostica, to be simply "Muslims", and in both cases abandoning the previous ethnic label of "Albanians," which these villages used in the census conducted during "Yugoslavian" times. A number of our informants confirmed that the self-attribution "Albanian" was purposely abandoned in order to avoid problems following the Yugoslav Wars and associated violent incursions of Serbian para-military forces in the area. The oldest generation of the villagers however are still fluent in a dialect of Ghegh Albanian, which appears to have been neglected by European linguists thus far. Additionally, the presence of an Albanian minority in this area has never been brought to the attention of international stakeholders by either the former Yugoslav or the current Serbian authorities."
  23. ^ Matthew C., Curtis (2012). Slavic-Albanian Language Contact, Convergence, and Coexistence. The Ohio State University. p. 140.
  24. ^ Nomachi, Motoki (2019). "The Gorani People in Search of Identity: The Current Sociolinguistic Situation Among the Gorani Community of the Former Yugoslavia" (PDF). Slavis Eurasian Studies (34). Sapporo, Japan.
  25. ^ Dankaz, Musa (2018). The Gorani People During the Kosovo War: Ethnic Identity in the Conflict. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: La Salle University. pp. 51, 52, 75, 77-78.

Literature

[edit]
Africa
Americas
Asia
Europe
Assimilation by religions
Assimilation by writings
Opposite trends
Related concepts