Dark Mode

Jump to content

User talk:Mateus2019

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 24 days ago by Bucherfresser in topic Category:Ethnic masks
File:Steampunk Gallery page of Wikimedia Commons - no text. Gemini 2.5 Flash + Mattes.png
archives

* 2019-2025
* 2026
*** navAID ***
for selected pages within this user namespace
Contributions

... show sub-pages ... ====>

Personal usage
Studies

... show sub-pages ... ====>



Favorite files

... show sub-pages ... ====>

Projects

... show sub-pages ... ====>



Galerieseiten/Verschiebung

[edit]
Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo Mateus2019, du bist mit dieser Verschiebung auf meiner Beobachtungsliste erschienen. Nun liegt das Museum zwar gerade eben auf Gemarkung Kuppenheim-Oberndorf, es ist jedoch uber Gaggenau anzufahren, nennt als Adresse Gaggenau und hat die Gaggenauer Unimog-Produktion zum Thema. Die Bezeichnung "Unimog-Museum Gaggenau" ist daher durchaus gelaufig. Die eigenmachtige Verschiebung "Unimog Museum Gaggenau.jpg" nach "Unimog Museum in Kuppenheim-Oberndorf (aussen) 2013.jpg" lasst sich daher nicht als Behebung eines offensichtlichen Fehlers begrunden und ist damit falsch.
Dann hast du das Bild in deine neue Galerieseite Kuppenheim eingebaut, fur die du leider den vollig veralteten Bildbestand des deutschen Wikipedia-Artikels verwendest. Inzwischen gibt es auf Commons sehr viel neuere und bessere Fotos, die bloss noch keiner fur die Bebilderung ausgewertet hat. DAS ware mal eine sinnvolle Aufgabe, statt lieblose Galerieseiten mit veralteten Bildern und nur einer Sprachversion anzulegen.
Die Kuppenheimer Kirche St. Sebastian (von der es ebenfalls neuere Fotos gibt) hast du ubrigens auf die Galerieseite von Forbach gesetzt. Gruss Sitacuisses (talk) 15:16, 5 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hallo, Danke fur den Hinweis. MfG --Mateus2019 (talk) 16:40, 5 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 13:36, 22 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Datei verschieben

[edit]
Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Guten Abend @Mateus2019 hast du beim Datei-Verschieben die zweite Datei File:Berghotel Hohenaschau 3.jpg ubersehen? Grusse Ricardalovesmonuments (talk) 17:09, 25 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

Jakob Philipp Hackert

[edit]
Latest comment: 6 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I know I'm asking about an edit from 15 years ago, but on gallery page Jakob Philipp Hackert why is File:Hackert, St. Peter von der Milvischen Brucke aus gesehen, 1777.jpg marked with a template indicating that the identification is disputed? - Jmabel ! talk 05:24, 2 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

can't remember, threw it out --Mateus2019 (talk) 07:09, 2 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Umbenennung

[edit]
Latest comment: 6 months ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Moin! Du hast hier eine Verschiebung vorgenommen. Ich wusste gerne, worin denn der obvious error bestand und wo dann das Verschiebekriterium 3 gegriffen hat. Ich sehe da namlich nichts. NNW 06:13, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Die Datei wurde in mehreren Wikis als Asyut Governorate verwendet, daher habe ich dem Vorschlag umgesetzt. Der alte Name war missverstandlich, da es eine Stadt dieses Namens gibt. --Mateus2019 (talk) 06:22, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
Im gesamten Kartenset wird der verkurzte Namen verwendet, ein ganz ubliches Vorgehen bei diesen Verwaltungskarten. Jetzt gibt es eine Datei, die nicht mehr im Namensschema ist. Missverstandlich ist auch kein obvious error. NNW 06:26, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
viele andere Dateinamen der agypt. Gouvernemente sind leider mehrdeutig = eigentl. falsch. Gut, dass da mal jemand tatig geworden ist. Oder geht es Dir um das "rationale" --Mateus2019 (talk)
Mehrdeutig ist nicht falsch. Viel Vergnugen beim Verschieben von Category:Moon, wo es doch so viele Monde gibt. Ich habe keine Ahnung, was du mit "rational" meinst, aber die Verschiebung entsprach keiner Verschieberegel und hat das Datenset nur verschlechtert. NNW 06:42, 11 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Copyright status: File:Ausweis einer sozialversicherungspflichtigen Erwerbstatigkeit fur die Landesversicherungsanstalt Oberbayern 1990 - scan by Mattes.jpg

l`rby@ belaruskaia belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) b'lgarski catala cestina dansk Deutsch Deutsch (Sie-Form) English espanol frsy suomi francais galego `bryt hindii hrvatski magyar italiano Ri Ben Yu knndd hangugeo makedonski mlyaallN Bahasa Melayu norsk bokmal norsk nynorsk norsk polski portugues portugues do Brasil romana russkii sicilianu slovencina slovenscina svenska tullu Turkce ukrayins'ka Zhong Wen Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) Zhong Wen (Tai Wan ) +/-
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ausweis einer sozialversicherungspflichtigen Erwerbstatigkeit fur die Landesversicherungsanstalt Oberbayern 1990 - scan by Mattes.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 16 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Flags with flowers

[edit]
Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Flags with flowers has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 03:33, 23 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Wiki Loves Monuments 2025 Deutschland

[edit]
Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hallo Mateus2019,

Sieger 2024 - Verladeturm Oderhafen

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. bis zum 30. September 2025 findet zum 15. Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments (WLM) statt. Dabei konnen Bau-, Boden- und Kulturdenkmale fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich gern wieder ein, dieses Jahr mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

Vergangenes Jahr hat GPSLeo mit dem Verladeturm Oderhafen Gross Neuendorf wahrend eines Hochwassers gewonnen. Welcher Fotograf oder welche Fotografin tritt dieses Jahr die Nachfolge an?

Nach WLM 2024 sind wieder zahlreiche neue Denkmallisten entstanden - zum Beispiel in Greiz in Thuringen oder in Konigslutter am Elm in Niedersachsen. Nachdem es in Thuringen uber lange Zeit nicht uberall Kulturdenkmallisten gab, ist dieses Bundesland jetzt fast vollstandig abgedeckt und die Listen freuen sich uber Fotos. Hier findest du einen Einstieg in die Thuringer Listen.

Fur die Suche nach Motiven gibt es bei Wikipedia zahlreiche Listen und Karten. Als Einstieg hilft diese Ubersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhaltst du auf der Mitmach-Seite.

Fur das einfache Auffinden haben wir eine Upload-Karte erstellt, in der viele aber leider noch nicht alle Kulturdenkmale angezeigt werden konnen. Das Laden der Objekte dauert dort etwas.

Wir haben dieses Jahr drei Sonderpreise fur Bilder zum Thema ,,Bauernhofe und Bauernhauser" ausgelobt.

Damit es ab 1. September mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Ausserdem laden wir Dich ein, ab Anfang September 2025 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Diese bewertet die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelt so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die Anfang November tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Monuments 2025 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist hier bald freigeschaltet. Du benotigst dafur nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Fur Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfugung. Falls du im nachsten Jahr keine Einladung fur Wiki Loves Monuments Deutschland haben mochtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir wurden das naturlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spass und Erfolg beim grossten Fotowettbewerb wunscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z thomas 19:05, 25 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:45, 6 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

[edit]
2023 Picture of the Year: Incense plays an important role in Vietnamese life. It is considered as a sacred bridge to connect the visible life of human beings and the world of heaven, earth, and gods. Photo taken in Quang Phu Cau village, on the outskirts of Hanoi, Vietnam. In this picture, incense sticks are being set out to dry, after being dipped in the incense solution.

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2024 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year is the nineteenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and top 5% of most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2023 Picture of the Year contest.

File:Kazue Tomimoto (1893-1966) photographic portrait before 1945.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 5 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Can you correct the description so: "description= A photographic portrait of Kazue Tomimoto (1893-1966), feminist writer and activist."? Thank you. -- Preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.61.87.223 (talk) 15:58, 23 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

I think this is already perfect enough. Greetings, --Mateus2019 (talk) 16:02, 23 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Ok, but can you remove the excessive space between = and protographic, and correct it with "Photographic"? Thank you. 82.61.87.223 16:04, 23 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Move request

[edit]
Latest comment: 4 months ago9 comments7 people in discussion

Can you correctly rename these files: File:Kawaji toshiyoshi.jpg as File:Kawaji Toshiyoshi's statue.jpg, File:Mushanokoji and his daughter.jpg as File:Saneatsu Mushanokoji and his third daughter.jpg, File:Hitler and Viscount Mushanokoji.jpg as File:Adolf Hitler and Viscount Kintomo Mushanokoji.jpg, File:Takuya Takahashi young.jpg as File:Takuya Takahashi (minister era).png, File:Takuya Takahashi sensei.png as File:Portrait of Takuya Takahashi.png, File:Hidesaburo Ueno.jpg as File:Portrait of Hidesaburo Ueno.jpg, File:Emperor Showa inspection.jpg as File:Emperor Showa's inspection tour (1942).jpg, File:Letzel 1913.png as File:Matsushima Park Hotel in 1913.png, File:Matsushima 1913.png as File:Matsushima Park Hotel (1913).jpg, File:Ishihara brothers.png as File:Ishihara siblings (1941).png, File:Tomimoto and Otake.jpg as File:Tomimoto and Otake families on marriage.jpg, File:Tomimoto marriage.jpg as File:Kenkichi Tomimoto and Kazue Otake's marriage.jpg, Category:Yo Takai as Category:Yo Takai, File:Mushanokoji Saneatsu und andere.jpg as File:Shirakaba members (1909).jpg, File:Kintomo Mushanokoji and his 2nd wife-c. 1930s.jpg as File:Kintomo Mushanokoji and his wife - c. 1930s.jpg, File:Kokichi Otake group.jpg as File:Kazue Tomimoto's group.jpg, File:Ribbentrop and Mushanokoji.jpg as File:Joachim von Ribbentrop seated with Kintomo Mushanokoji and others (1937).jpg, File:Saneatsu Mushanokoji 3.jpg as File:Saneatsu Mushanokoji 1918 (cropped).jpg, File:Saneatsu Mushanokoji 02.jpg as File:Saneatsu Mushanokoji (1953).jpg, File:Saneatsu Mushanokoji 2.jpg as File:Saneatsu Mushanokoji (1942).jpg. Thank you very much. -- Preceding unsigned comment was added by 79.40.236.98 (talk) 22:47, 23 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

(talk page stalker) To the IP who wrote this, if you see it: Is there any reason you are asking one individual to do a bunch of renames rather than placing {{Rename}} on the relevant file pages? - Jmabel ! talk 03:00, 24 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
But the file pages are now blocked, so can you do it? 79.40.236.98 06:05, 24 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
This IP is a globally locked LTA who is editing and canvassing using countless IPs from Italy. --Achim55 (talk) 07:32, 24 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Those wishes must be requested seperately through the regular pipeline, see what User:Jmabel wrote --Mateus2019 (talk) 07:59, 24 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
@Jmabel, and also to Mateus2019: This IP user was also blocked yesterday, see COM:ANU#IP vandal User:193.207.178.219. I think that there are reasons that those files are protected, if I'm looking at the mass of rename requests above. The IP user should read Commons:File renaming#reasons once more. I can't find any reason to rename most of the files above. Especially the reasons 1 and 3 to 6 don't apply to all of the requests. Also, the names mostly aren't ambiguous for rename reason 2, maybe except File:Letzel 1913.png. And if some of them are meaningless, is at least questionable. The persons on the files seem to be correct identified and not misspelled, therefore there is no good reason to rename most of the files. But the user did not even give any rename reason number or a valid reason for every of the rename requests. Then I don't see, why anyone should rename them. Especially not, if the user has been blocked often in the past.
In addition, Category:Yo Takai is no file at all, it's a different procedure to rename a category than a file. It's wrong in this file list. This IP has just been blocked two times because of speedy requests for special character category redirects which are useful because most users haven't keyboards with such Japanese transcription characters as o, and bots can move automatically misplaced files from such redirects to the target names. The user also made such a request on Rachmat04's talk page, and yesterday on Turelio's talk page different ones. And they should better read the file rename rules once more, but I doubt they does that. Thanks to Achim. --176.1.2.134 08:08, 24 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
Can you rename them anyway, so it's definitely closed? Thank you very much. 79.20.13.71 08:34, 24 September 2025 (UTC)Reply
I won't make requests for those files above, because I'm not convinced of that. Please don't edit anymore here now and please don't make any speedy requests for redirects without those Japanese transcription characters. Thank you for that. And please take the time of your block now to read the file rename rules once more and think about your requests above once more afterwards. That could help. --176.1.2.134 10:16, 24 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Prolific sockpuppeteer GMatteotti (talk * contribs) creates various requests under various IP-s. They mostly touch Japanese and Italian photos. Please do not fulfill the requests. You can read en:Wikipedia:DENY. Taivo (talk) 14:12, 25 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2024 voting is open!

[edit]

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you previously voted in the Picture of the Year contest. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2024) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

In this second and final round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2024.

Round 2 will end at UTC.

Click here to vote now! If you have already voted for Round 2, please ignore this message.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

Template:Teilnehmer WikiCon 2025

[edit]
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Template:Teilnehmer WikiCon 2025 has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Turelio (talk) 19:38, 14 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hallo Mateus2019, du hast dich bislang leider nicht an der Diskussion beteiligt. Der LA konnte geschlossen werden, wenn es gelange, die Seite User:Mattes/Wikimedia involvements von der Kategorie Category:WikiCon 2025 zu entfernen, da sie dort nicht hineingehort. Das ist mir aber auch mit der Umkategorisierung deines Baustein nicht gelungen. --Turelio (talk) 10:06, 15 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Baroque palaces in Germany

[edit]
Latest comment: 4 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi @Mateus2019: , diese cat hast Du erstellt, obwohl es schon Baroque castles in Germany gab. Absicht, Irrtum? Du konntest das nicht mit castles zusammenfuhen ? Warst Du auf der Wikicon, wenn ja, schade dass wir uns nicht gesehen haben. Gruss--Oursana (talk) 05:08, 23 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

G.M. meine liebe, naja nur online... Wie ich festgestellt habe, sind "castles" und "palaces" oft beliebig in deren Namensgebung, genauso wie "castles" und "forts". Das ist ein echtes Problem. Ich wurde sagen, dass man es erstmal so lasst wie jetzt und irgendwann mal eine Grundsatzdiskussion fuhrt, die in einem Konsens = Policy endet. Mir schwebt so etwas wie "palaces and castles..." oder "forts and castles ... " vor. LG aus Munchen-Haidhausen! --Mateus2019 (talk) 05:49, 23 October 2025 (UTC)Reply

Cities with irrelevant images

[edit]
Latest comment: 3 months ago6 comments2 people in discussion

Please do not open galleries of Iranian cities any more, you're inserting irrelevant images which are not even inside the particular city, therefore confusing uploaders and other users. Additionally, the descriptions are often wrong, incomplete, or meaningless, and the galleries themselves are a total mess or/and tiny. You are doing damage to our Wiki project Iran and in the future I will simply redirect them to a properly organized category. Categories with detailed infoboxes are enough. Thank you for your understanding. --Orijentolog (talk) 00:19, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

I need examples, otherwise this comment is worthless. Mostly, the files for my gallery pages are picked from en.wp 1-1 (a place of high standard and quality content-wise). Yes, most pages are imcomplete because THIS IS A PROJECT going to be perfect in some decades. Irrelevant images in gallery pages are very rare. --Mateus2019 (talk) 02:58, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
You saw examples well in reverts. Nope, en.wp is far from "a place of high standard." For example, in the article about en:Sari, Iran they use images of Resket Tower (which you also used in gallery) and Miyansheh Lake, both tens of kilometers outside of the city. If you opened those two Commons categories, you would see where both are actually located, in both infobox and parent categories. Commons is a place of far higher standard because over 10,000 of buildings and places are organized strictly by administrative units. It is the product of many years of my hard work here, therefore I'm not accepting chaos with misleading images. On Wikipedia, they use irrelevant outsider images with the aim of promoting tourism or embellishing the article. Here that's not the case. Regarding the redirects, I already upgraded some of the galleries you opened, like Kish, Iran & Laft, and I can do the same with the rest. Now galleries are indeed useful with precise descriptions & links, not superficial, tiny and with vague descriptions (like putting "building" or "street" under the image). That's what I can do as a friendly help, I'll just need time for the rest. --Orijentolog (talk) 07:38, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Terrible teamwork, you can delete single images but not destroy (redir overwrite) whole gallery pages. Do it better. You didnt manage to create them in the past. As I said the images and their descriptions are taken from en.wp. I cannot judge over the descriptive texts because I dont know much of that country (and never been there). Do not continue your rude behaviour. I am going to revert your overwritings because it is vandalism. --Mateus2019 (talk) 08:05, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Take it easy. Of course I can not blame you for not understanding precise locations, even the most experienced members of our Wikiproject Iran make such mistakes (confusing namesake cities, counties, even provinces). Your behavior was rude, insisting on mistakes. Temporary redirects are much better option than keeping tiny galleries with errors, random images and no purpose (see: Commons:Galleries#The benefits of galleries). It takes time and effort to create a good gallery, and your throwing in a handful of photos with vague descriptions tells us that you didn't even bother to look at the image description or the corresponding category. --Orijentolog (talk) 09:44, 18 November 2025 (UTC)Reply
Well that's (upgrading descriptions and later on removing the temporary redirects) a surprising offer. Thanks for that work + time + effort in advance. I am also surprised you have experienced vast incorrect informations and images at the English language Wikipedia (thanks for your explanations). You could be right that people of the hospitality and tourist promotion industry saw a chance to promote their area or human settlement by putting images of the vicinity in theses articles just to make it more interesting (although misplaced of irrelevant). So now we have turned "a bad situation" in a good situation by discussion. That's rare on this project. Good night, --Mateus2019 (talk) 16:41, 19 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations, dear license reviewer

[edit]
Latest comment: 2 months ago4 comments3 people in discussion
If you use the helper gadget, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi Mateus2019, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files - please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can enable the LicenseReview gadget from Preferences.

Important: You should not review your own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons!--C1K98V ( ) 08:40, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Bedivere, You may remove their Autopatrol user right. Thanks C1K98V ( ) 08:42, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
My dear Thanks a lot and happy holidays! Greetings from Germany to Chile :-) --Mateus2019 (talk) 10:22, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
For you too! Bedivere (talk) 18:28, 24 December 2025 (UTC)Reply
File:GER -- BW -- RPT -- Ulm -- Marktpl. 9 -- (Ulmer Museum) -- Mattes 2022-03-13 Batch (15).jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 16:27, 2 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

[edit]
Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, while checking on ListeriaBot I noticed it was producing frequent large edits of numerous gallery pages (for instance Paintings of Lazarus and Dives). On checking them I noticed that the bot has been in fact adding a copy of each gallery to each page approximately once a week since october the 23rd, which is the date when you edited the presentation of I think all the pages that are affected. Removing {{Wikidata list end}} is probably what caused that, the pages you edited without removing it seem to work quite well Ostrea (talk) 21:05, 4 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Deine alte Diskussionsseite

[edit]
Latest comment: 1 month ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hallo, hast du eigentlich deine alte Diskussionsseite noch unter Beobachtung? Ich habe nur zufallig entdeckt, dass der dort von mir uber "Kategorie diskutieren" automatisch(!) angelegte Abschnitt aufgrund der zahlreichen Vorlagen auf der Seite schon gar nicht mehr richtig angezeigt werden kann. Den Hinweis am Seitenanfang, dass man dort gar nicht mehr editieren solle, habe ich erst nachtraglich entdeckt - dass dieser bei den diversen Tools nichts bringt, die den Ersteller einer Datei/Seite/Kategorie/... automatisch informieren, durfte spatestens jetzt klar sein... ;-) Buffty (talk) 23:53, 4 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

GuMo Buffty, ja ab und zu schau' ich mal. Da gibts doch so eine Vorlage wie "no bot edits"? LG, --Mateus2019 (talk) 02:15, 5 January 2026 (UTC)Reply
Ich bin ja auch kein Bot... ;-) Diese vier Edits wurden automatisch durch einen einzigen Klick von mir erstellt, ohne dass ich vorher im Detail wusste, was passiert. (Im Dialog fur "Kategorie diskutieren" heisst es unter "Weitere Informationen": "Ein Klick auf ,,Weiter" wird: [...] * den ursprunglich Ersteller der Kategorie in seiner aktivierten Sprache informieren \ All dies geschieht uber Dein Benutzerkonto und auf Diskussionsseiten unter Verwendung Deiner Signatur [...].".)
Ich gehe davon aus, dass das auch bei den anderen 70 Eintragen auf deiner alten Disc so war - die meisten sind ja ahnliche Einladungen zu einer Diskussion, ebenfalls zu einer Kategorie oder auch zu Loschantragen. Solange es also (noch ;-)) Dateien, Seiten und/oder Kategorien gibt, die du mit deinem alten Account erstellt bzw. hochgeladen hattest, werden solche Einladungen weiterhin automatisch auf dieser Seite landen...
Unabhangig davon mochte ich dich hiermit noch einmal ausdrucklich einladen mit dem Eintrag, der auf deiner alten Seite nicht mehr dargestellt werden kann:

Wendelstein mountain has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Buffty (talk) 13:42, 5 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Aramean vs. Syriac

[edit]
Latest comment: 28 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, It seems you were involved in renaming files about this subject. Could you please offer your opinion here: COM:ANU#Aramean vs. Assyrian? Thanks, Yann (talk) 18:43, 27 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Category:Ethnic masks

[edit]
Latest comment: 24 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category:Ethnic masks is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

C2: Unuseful empty category

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead.


l`rby@ Deutsch English espanol suomi francais hindii Bahasa Indonesia Ri Ben Yu kyrgyzcha pNjaabii portugues russkii Turkce Tieng Viet Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) +/-

Bucherfresser (talk) 12:20, 31 January 2026 (UTC)Reply