Dark Mode

Jump to content

User talk:Kozuch

Add topic
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Latest comment: 2 years ago by JopkeB in topic Notification about possible deletion
English: Welcome to the Commons, Kozuch!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | az@rbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | catala | cestina | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | English | espanol | Esperanto | euskara | estremenu | francais | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | islenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdi | Latina | lietuviu | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandes | Nederlands | norsk bokmal | occitan | Plattduutsch | polski | portugues | portugues do Brasil | romana | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovencina | slovenscina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Turkce | veneto | Tieng Viet | Zazaki | Ellenika | belaruskaia | belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) | b'lgarski | Iron | makedonski | nokhchiin | russkii | srpski / srpski | toch'iki | ukrayins'ka | k`art`uli | Hayeren | nepaalii | bhojpurii | mraatthii | hindii | asmiiy'aa | baaNlaa | tmilll | mlyaallN | siNhl | aithy | stt: | mnmaabhaasaa | hangugeo | Ri Ben Yu | Zhong Wen | Zhong Wen (Tai Wan ) | Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) | Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) | Yue Yu | `bryt | rdw | l`rby@ | toerkhjh | sndhy | frsy | +/-
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--SieBot 19:07, 26 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Canon HG10 video camera top.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This image came from this set, which are clearly not created by the Flickr user, so their licensing statements are invalid. I've deleted the image as a copyright violation. Please try to evaluate the credibility of Flickr users' claims before transferring their uploads here. Keep in mind that a lot of people on Flickr habitually violate copyright laws out of ignorance or arrogance. --LX (talk, contribs) 20:38, 21 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


File:Give_One_Get_One_OLPC.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File deletion warning File:Give_One_Get_One_OLPC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans l`rby@ belaruskaia belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) b'lgarski paiuwbhaasaa baaNlaa bosanski catala cestina dansk Deutsch Deutsch (Sie-Form) Zazaki dhivehibas Ellenika English Esperanto espanol eesti frsy suomi francais galego `bryt hrvatski magyar hayeren Bahasa Indonesia islenska italiano Ri Ben Yu hangugeo joseonmal kyrgyzcha makedonski mlyaallN Bahasa Melayu mnmaabhaasaa norsk bokmal Plattduutsch Nederlands norsk nynorsk norsk occitan polski pStw portugues portugues do Brasil romana russkii sicilianu slovencina slovenscina shqip srpski / srpski svenska aithy Turkce ukrayins'ka Tieng Viet Zhong Wen Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) +/-

MBisanz talk 19:57, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply


File:HP_TouchSmart.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File deletion warning File:HP_TouchSmart.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans l`rby@ belaruskaia belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) b'lgarski paiuwbhaasaa baaNlaa bosanski catala cestina dansk Deutsch Deutsch (Sie-Form) Zazaki dhivehibas Ellenika English Esperanto espanol eesti frsy suomi francais galego `bryt hrvatski magyar hayeren Bahasa Indonesia islenska italiano Ri Ben Yu hangugeo joseonmal kyrgyzcha makedonski mlyaallN Bahasa Melayu mnmaabhaasaa norsk bokmal Plattduutsch Nederlands norsk nynorsk norsk occitan polski pStw portugues portugues do Brasil romana russkii sicilianu slovencina slovenscina shqip srpski / srpski svenska aithy Turkce ukrayins'ka Tieng Viet Zhong Wen Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) +/-

Abigor talk 14:37, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Presenting_IICD_(long_version).ogg

[edit]
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File deletion warning File:Presenting_IICD_(long_version).ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans l`rby@ belaruskaia belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) b'lgarski paiuwbhaasaa baaNlaa bosanski catala cestina dansk Deutsch Deutsch (Sie-Form) Zazaki dhivehibas Ellenika English Esperanto espanol eesti frsy suomi francais galego `bryt hrvatski magyar hayeren Bahasa Indonesia islenska italiano Ri Ben Yu hangugeo joseonmal kyrgyzcha makedonski mlyaallN Bahasa Melayu mnmaabhaasaa norsk bokmal Plattduutsch Nederlands norsk nynorsk norsk occitan polski pStw portugues portugues do Brasil romana russkii sicilianu slovencina slovenscina shqip srpski / srpski svenska aithy Turkce ukrayins'ka Tieng Viet Zhong Wen Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) +/-

Lupo 09:47, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

AWB

[edit]
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi approved your AWB-request. Please always make sure to enable the "Using AWB" bit and to give good summaries. I would personally like you also always to add edit-summaries to your handed edits in feauture. Thank you, abf <> 11:16, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! I will do my best!--Kozuch (talk) 12:14, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Valued Image Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 17 years ago7 comments3 people in discussion
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Board of ADSL modem.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Scope changed from Specialized embedded computer boards to Board of ADSL modem --Kozuch (talk) 12:23, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Eusebius (talk) 22:04, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Reply

OLPC mission

[edit]
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Prosimte, kdyz uz jsme u toho. Zamyslel si se nekdy na cily teto organizace?! Dyt to je jak traktorizace Afriky. K cemu jsou ty laptopy detem v peruanskejch horach? Dyt tam maji spanelskou encyklopedii, ale jejich rodnym jazykem je kecuanstina (a v ty dobe se se spanelstinou teprve seznamuji). A kde si tam ten notebook pripoji do site, dyt tam to neni elektrifikovany! A to samy Afrika - vetsina tech deti ma rodnej jazyk neco jineho, nez anglictinu nebo francouzstinu. A co se stemi notbooky deje kdyz doslouzi? Je zajistena recyklace?--Juan de Vojnikov (talk) 09:05, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:XO-Beta1-mikemcgregor-2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:XO-Beta1-mikemcgregor-2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Flickr review

[edit]
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Good day Moshing. Unfortunately I have closed your request for trusted user as unsuccessful. Please take the advice & try again when you feel ready! Best regards, --Kanonkas(talk) 16:42, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Aspect ratio?

[edit]
Latest comment: 17 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi,

I try to notice any difference between the aspect ratio of file:Aljazeeraasset-GazaFOOD883.ogv. Can you tell me what you precisely did? --Jeroencommons (talk) 17:43, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. The flash videos on Al Jazeera site are shrunk. I thought the original uploader captioned the flash video and therefore it is shrunk on commons too. So I downloaded the file to my harddrive via the download link - the downloaded mpeg video had correct ratio already, I used ffmpeg2theora to convert it but I too notice, that there is no change after upload. My initiative did not work out suprisingly - any hints why?--Kozuch (talk) 20:52, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Maybe because all videos I've uploaded were also converted from the original mpg-files to ogv? I converted all mpg's to ogv's with OggConvert. So re-encoding is really not needed. --Jeroencommons (talk) 06:37, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
You did not get the point. The problem is, the videos display wrong on commons (shrunk), although the origilal files have/had correct ratio...--Kozuch (talk) 10:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Uze open console 10.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Uze open console 10.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content--that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans l`rby@ asturianu az@rbaycanca belaruskaia belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) b'lgarski paiuwbhaasaa baaNlaa catala cestina dansk Deutsch Deutsch (Sie-Form) Zazaki Ellenika English espanol euskara frsy suomi francais galego `bryt hindii hrvatski magyar hayeren Bahasa Indonesia italiano Ri Ben Yu hangugeo Letzebuergesch makedonski mlyaallN mraatthii Bahasa Melayu Malti mnmaabhaasaa norsk bokmal Plattduutsch Nederlands norsk nynorsk norsk polski portugues portugues do Brasil romana russkii sicilianu slovencina slovenscina shqip srpski / srpski svenska tmilll toch'iki aithy Turkce ukrayins'ka o`zbekcha / uzbekcha Tieng Viet Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) +/-

-Kungfuman (talk) 17:55, 17 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Categorization

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Not a problem. --Kevmin (talk) 15:05, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

While on the subject, did you happen to photograph the infromation tag for File:Palaeontological exhibition Prague 22.JPG? at this point I cant place it beyond Unidentified fossil plants.
Hi, I am affraid I did not take that tag... All I have is uploaded already.--Kozuch (talk) 22:46, 13 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


File:Creative Commons - Get Creative.ogg

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Creative Commons - Get Creative.ogg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mike Linksvayer (talk) 01:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Narodni divadlo inside 2.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

http://www.eu2009.cz/en/media-service/photo-gallery/host-photographer/host-photographer--2535/ says: for non-commercial purposes only (including the media). This image is not free for every commercial purpose, so nonfree an therefore delted. --Martin H. (talk) 16:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

The assh*les must have chnaged the text, I am quite sure I was correct on the license.--Kozuch (talk) 16:15, 20 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


Uze open console 08.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as Uze open console 08.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

l`rby@ belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) b'lgarski cestina dansk Deutsch Ellenika English espanol suomi francais galego hrvatski magyar italiano Ri Ben Yu makedonski polski portugues portugues do Brasil russkii sicilianu slovenscina svenska aithy Tieng Viet Zhong Wen Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) +/-

--95.24.183.160 20:03, 27 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

File:Mlearning - Using pdas and mobiles in the workplace.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Mlearning - Using pdas and mobiles in the workplace.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

OSX (talk * contributions) 08:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)Reply


File source is not properly indicated: File:DynaTAC8000X.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
l`rby@ asturianu belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) baaNlaa catala cestina dansk Deutsch Ellenika English espanol euskara frsy suomi francais galego `bryt hindii hrvatski magyar italiano Ri Ben Yu hangugeo makedonski mlyaallN norsk bokmal Plattduutsch Nederlands norsk nynorsk norsk polski portugues portugues do Brasil russkii sicilianu slovencina slovenscina svenska aithy Turkce ukrayins'ka Tieng Viet Zhong Wen Zhong Wen (Zhong Guo Da Lu ) Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) +/-
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:DynaTAC8000X.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 17:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion
l`rby@ belaruskaia belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) b'lgarski catala cestina dansk Deutsch Deutsch (Sie-Form) English espanol frsy suomi francais galego `bryt hindii hrvatski magyar italiano Ri Ben Yu knndd hangugeo makedonski mlyaallN Bahasa Melayu norsk bokmal norsk nynorsk norsk polski portugues portugues do Brasil romana russkii sicilianu slovencina slovenscina svenska tullu Turkce ukrayins'ka Zhong Wen Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) Zhong Wen (Tai Wan ) +/-
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Alexandr_Vondra.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Martin H. (talk) 19:37, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Also:

--Martin H. (talk) 20:21, 16 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

See Commons:Deletion requests/Photographs using Template:PD-CzechGov for a regular deletion request. --Martin H. (talk) 18:03, 20 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Nachod telephoto 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Quality fall-off towards border but above the QI threshold for me if you add a geocode. --Iotatau 23:08, 19 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Geocode added.--Kozuch 08:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. --Iotatau 09:35, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Nove Mesto nad Metuji, tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok but please add Geocoding --Berthold Werner 17:27, 20 September 2009 (UTC) Coordinates added.--Kozuch 15:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC)Reply


File tagging File:Radiolokator_VERA.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
l`rby@ belaruskaia belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) paiuwbhaasaa baaNlaa catala cestina dansk Deutsch Deutsch (Sie-Form) Ellenika English espanol euskara frsy suomi francais galego `bryt hindii hrvatski magyar hayeren italiano Ri Ben Yu knndd hangugeo lietuviu latviesu makedonski mlyaallN mraatthii mnmaabhaasaa norsk bokmal Plattduutsch Nederlands norsk polski portugues romana russkii sicilianu slovencina slovenscina srpski / srpski svenska aithy Turkce ukrayins'ka rdw Tieng Viet Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) +/-
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Radiolokator_VERA.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Radiolokator_VERA.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

High Contrast (talk) 19:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Ministry of Defence

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello!

Where exactly can you find on the homepage of the czech armed forces that their material is free to use? --High Contrast (talk) 11:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Their images are not free in general, they made free only specific images (the page linked as image source contains the permission in Czech). If you do not trust me feel free to ask someone else.--Kozuch (talk) 09:53, 27 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Please do not delete my pictures

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. Please do not delete my pictures by uploading different pictures over them. Choose different name. Thank you.--Ondrej Zvacek (talk) 16:55, 28 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seal of Nachod town from 1570 (big).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Excellent Detail!!! -- NormanB 00:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prim clockwork.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good work. Yann 09:26, 11 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pecet rychtarska Novomesta (Nove Mesto nad Metuji).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --99of9 12:41, 26 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seal of Nachod town from 1570 (small).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --Mbdortmund 21:40, 21 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

History of the Czech Republic and some of subcategories

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification History of the Czech Republic and some of subcategories has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) baaNlaa cestina Deutsch English espanol francais hindii hrvatski magyar italiano Ri Ben Yu knndd makedonski Nederlands polski portugues russkii sicilianu slovenscina svenska tullu aithy ukrayins'ka Tieng Viet Wu Yu Zhong Wen +/-

--SJu (talk) 18:22, 20 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

A-5

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Why you say that this is not A-5 ? PMG (talk) 18:45, 20 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I seem to have removed the wrong category... fixed.--Kozuch (talk) 18:50, 20 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


Category:Interior of Opocno Castle

[edit]
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category:Interior of Opocno Castle have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Podzemnik (talk) 23:02, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opocno castle in 2009 07.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 17:58, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campanile of St. Mark's Basilica Kozuch 05.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Better overall view with none of the issues raised in the other photo. --Ianare 19:38, 14 April 2010 (UTC)Reply


File:Pianist.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Pianist.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Andrei Romanenko (talk) 03:05, 21 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jaromer Zakladni skola Na ostrove Entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments composition is good but details e.g. of the sculptures could be better --Mbdortmund 17:53, 2 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

FP Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:STS-132- Liftoff Space Shuttle Atlantis.ogv, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:STS-132- Liftoff Space Shuttle Atlantis.ogv has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:58, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Thanks!

[edit]
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Kozuch: thanks for adding the license to my presentation file: I looked through the documentation and honestly couldn't figure out how to do it myself. Anyway, I really appreciate it.

Cheers, Jonathan

You are welcome!--Kozuch (talk) 17:15, 19 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum Hradec Kralove 046.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, but 2nd version id too much cropped. I suggested another crop. --Kae 08:11, 24 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

Prepsane soubory, udaje k overeni

[edit]
Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Zdravim. Narazil jsem v diskusi Commons:Hospoda U Commons#Nahrazovani fotek na zminku o chybe, kterou jsi v roce 2009 udelal pri nahravani fotografie. Predpokladam, ze od te doby jsi jiz byl poucen nebo ses sam rozkoukal, ze nove fotky se musi nahravat pod novym nazvem a ze prepisovat novymi fotkami starsi fotky, obzvlast cizi, je nepripustne. Nejsi jediny, kdo se teto chyby dopoustel - zrejme by to chtelo jeste vic vylepsit napovedu a nahravaci dialogy. Nicmene protoze malokdo se ji dopusti jen jednou, pro jistotu jsem letmo prosel vsechny tve editace typu "uploaded a new version". Vetsina byla v poradku a napriklad doladeni barev u nekterych leteckych fotek byla velmi uzitecna prace. Take tvoje vlastni fotky jsou docela pekne, nicmene jsem narazil na 8 pripadu (vsechny z roku 2009), kde jsi svymi fotkami prepsal cizi fotky, a navic ve vsech pripadech jsi v popisu ponechal puvodni udaje o autorovi a datu porizeni, cimz jsi de facto sve fotky vydaval za fotky jinych autoru a navic s chybnym udajem o datu porizeni. Tim se puvodni autori mohou citit dvojnasob poskozeni (jednak ze jsi neopravnene odstranil, resp. skryl jejich fotky, a za druhe zes jejich autorstvi prisoudil tve fotky), nehlede na naruseni projektu jako takoveho. Tvoje uploady jsem revertoval, t. j. na puvodnich nazvech jsem obnovil puvodni fotky, a navic jsem tve chybne uploadovane fotky nahral pod novymi nazvy.

Vypisu ti tady jejich seznam

Bylo by dobre, aby sis ty tvoje fotky jednu po druhe prosel a potvrdil sve autorstvi a licenci, prip. dalsi udaje.

  • Fotky jsi sice nahral, ale nikde ses neprohlasil za jejich autora, naopak jsi za autory tvych fotek (zrejme omylem) prohlasil uplne jine uzivatele. Pokud skutecne jsi autorem, mel bys vymazat z kolonky "Author" spekulace o uploaderovi a ponechat tam jen sve jmeno.
  • neni uplne zrejme, jestli jsi sve fotky jakozto autor uvolnil pod nejakou volnou licenci. V popisu jsi sice ponechal udaje o licenci, pod niz byly uvolneny puvodni, tebou prepsane fotky, ale neni jasne, jestli tvuj upload ma byt bran tak, ze jsi svoje fotky uvolnil pod toutez licenci. Spis to pusobi dojmem, jako ze sis popisu vubec nevsimal a o nejakych licencich vubec netusil, co to je - navic je divne, ze jsi prakticky kazdou z techto fotek nahral pod jinou licenci. Takze by bylo dobre, abys uvedene licence bud potvrdil, nebo poprel a nahradil radne udelenymi.
  • K tvym fotkam jsi neuvedl datum porizeni, respektive ponechal jsi u nich udaje vztahujici se k puvodnim fotografiim, ktere zjevne k tvym fotkam nepatri. Jakasi data jsou uvedena v EXIF datech. Pokud jsi si jisty, ze jsi mel datum ve fotaku spravne nastaveno, bylo by dobre, kdybys z kolonky "Date" odstranil obe spekulace vychazejici z dostupnych udaju (datum uploadu a datum dle EXIF) a ponechal pouze sablonu s datem.
  • Pokud se domnivas, ze do nekterych clanku, galerii nebo jinych stranek by mely byt pridany tvoje fotky, resp. mely by tam jimi byt nahrazeny jine fotky, tak ted je prilezitost to provest, tentokrat jiz radnou cestou.

Dalsim souborem, ktery jsem nahral pod novym nazvem, byl vyrez, kterym jsi prepsal puvodni fotku:

Prepsani jinou verzi je urceno pouze pro drobne technicke upravy, ktere nijak nemeni autorskou podstatu puvodniho dila. Pokud delas zasadni vyrez nebo jinou upravu, ktera podstatne meni puvodni dilo a jeho pojeti a kompozici, tak je to jiz odvozene dilo, ktere musis nahrat opet pod novym nazvem a nemel bys je vydavat za dilo puvodniho autora, ale za tve dilo vznikle pozmenenim ci vyuzitim puvodniho dila.

Vahal bych, jestli je spravne, ze jsi soubor File:Nachod CoA CZ.jpg prepsal verzi s uplne jinym odstinem modre a uplne jinym tvarem lva ve stitu - pokud barevne odstiny a podoba znaku nejsou jasne oficialne predepsany, tak by spis bylo vhodne ponechat v Commons obe verze. Ale vzhledem k tomu, ze -xfi- se k tomu zpracovani nehlasil jako ke svemu autorskemu dilu a ani jeden z vas jste neuvedli zdroje, z nichz jste sve predstavy o podobe znaku cerpali, tak je dost obtizne ten rozdil nejak resit. Neni prece mozne, aby z tehoz zdroje pochazely dve tak rozdilne podoby, a stejne tak neni mozne, aby bylo za oficialni podoby znaku vydavano neco, co je z poloviny dilem fantazie uzivatelu Commons.

Jeste jsem narazil v kategorii Nachod na nesrovnalost u fotek Metuje high water 01.JPG, Metuje high water 02.JPG, Metuje high water 03.JPG, Metuje high water 04.JPG, Metuje high water 05.JPG, nahranych 30. srpna 2009. Do popisu fotky uvadis datum 2009 (coz je, vzhledem k povaze subjektu fotky, udaj velmi malo presny) a v EXIF datech je udaj 30. dubna 2006. Pokus se prosim rozpomenout, ktery z techto udaju je spatne, a datum v popisu fotky upresnit. Zrovna velka voda je takovy typ udalosti, ze fotka bez spravneho casoveho udaje se stava encyklopedicky temer bezcennou. P. S. - ta Metuje high water 01.JPG je opravdu ze stejneho data jako ty dalsi ctyri fotky? Reka na ni vypada podstatne klidnejsi.

Doufam ze se tyhle drobnosti podari doresit a preji mnoho dalsich peknych fotek. --SJu (talk) 00:29, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Diky za spolupraci! Podivas se jeste na ty data? Hlavne u ty rozvodneny Metuje by to chtelo aspon vyjasnit jestli je to z 2006 nebo 2009. --SJu (talk) 22:44, 10 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

File tagging File:BeagleBoard_described.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
l`rby@ belaruskaia belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) paiuwbhaasaa baaNlaa catala cestina dansk Deutsch Deutsch (Sie-Form) Ellenika English espanol euskara frsy suomi francais galego `bryt hindii hrvatski magyar hayeren italiano Ri Ben Yu knndd hangugeo lietuviu latviesu makedonski mlyaallN mraatthii mnmaabhaasaa norsk bokmal Plattduutsch Nederlands norsk polski portugues romana russkii sicilianu slovencina slovenscina srpski / srpski svenska aithy Turkce ukrayins'ka rdw Tieng Viet Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) +/-
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:BeagleBoard_described.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Polarlys (talk) 00:09, 7 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:History_of_castle_Nachod

[edit]
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:History_of_castle_Nachod has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) baaNlaa cestina Deutsch English espanol francais hindii hrvatski magyar italiano Ri Ben Yu knndd makedonski Nederlands polski portugues russkii sicilianu slovenscina svenska tullu aithy ukrayins'ka Tieng Viet Wu Yu Zhong Wen +/-

12.77.211.28 00:25, 10 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Iraqi_Kurdish_village_orchard_near_Turkish_border.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Iraqi_Kurdish_village_orchard_near_Turkish_border.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rafy (talk) 22:08, 14 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nova radnice (New townhall), Nachod 04.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Taxiarchos228 10:08, 21 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nova radnice (New townhall), Nachod 10.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --Jebulon 15:57, 26 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! White Tower (Hradec Kralove) top angle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good --George Chernilevsky 07:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

PNG x SVG

[edit]
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Az budu chtit nahrat soubor SVG tak jej nahraji, kdyz nechci tak jej nenahraji, i kdyz to v SVG kreslim a vyexportuju to do PNG. Staci takhle? --W.Rebel (talk) 19:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Bukkake_vector_version.svg

[edit]
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Bukkake_vector_version.svg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 12:57, 23 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baby portrait 1-year-old.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 10:53, 17 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winter baby 10-months-old.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 10:54, 17 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1

[edit]
Latest comment: 14 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, Is the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 a compact digital camera? It is the same size as a DSLR, but with a fixed lens. Yann (talk) 14:31, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hi, that is a question. If you do not like myself categorizing that particular featured picture, you can remove the cat. But with that cat I want to point out nice images that were not taken with a DSLR or mirrorless interchangeable digital cameras.--Kozuch (talk) 17:37, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
PS. The article says "bridge camera" which I understand still as "compact" (we can create a new category called "FPs taken with a bridge camera).--Kozuch (talk) 17:38, 26 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
I am not against adding this kind of categories. It can indeed be useful, but technically, this camera is very closed to a DSLR. It is also in the same price range of the cheaper DSLRs.

Yann (talk) 16:09, 27 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Featured_videos

[edit]
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Featured_videos has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) baaNlaa cestina Deutsch English espanol francais hindii hrvatski magyar italiano Ri Ben Yu knndd makedonski Nederlands polski portugues russkii sicilianu slovenscina svenska tullu aithy ukrayins'ka Tieng Viet Wu Yu Zhong Wen +/-

78.8.209.167 23:45, 1 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Category:Stereoscopic_images

[edit]
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Category discussion notification Category:Stereoscopic_images has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) baaNlaa cestina Deutsch English espanol francais hindii hrvatski magyar italiano Ri Ben Yu knndd makedonski Nederlands polski portugues russkii sicilianu slovenscina svenska tullu aithy ukrayins'ka Tieng Viet Wu Yu Zhong Wen +/-

TheGrappler (talk) 19:11, 16 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Webconverger.png

[edit]
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Webconverger.png has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ben.MQ (talk) 17:01, 21 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Naprstek Museum - NM Prague 74.JPG

[edit]
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Naprstek Museum - NM Prague 74.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content--that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans l`rby@ asturianu az@rbaycanca belaruskaia belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) b'lgarski paiuwbhaasaa baaNlaa catala cestina dansk Deutsch Deutsch (Sie-Form) Zazaki Ellenika English espanol euskara frsy suomi francais galego `bryt hindii hrvatski magyar hayeren Bahasa Indonesia italiano Ri Ben Yu hangugeo Letzebuergesch makedonski mlyaallN mraatthii Bahasa Melayu Malti mnmaabhaasaa norsk bokmal Plattduutsch Nederlands norsk nynorsk norsk polski portugues portugues do Brasil romana russkii sicilianu slovencina slovenscina shqip srpski / srpski svenska tmilll toch'iki aithy Turkce ukrayins'ka o`zbekcha / uzbekcha Tieng Viet Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) +/-

Catfisheye (talk) 23:21, 21 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Child_Development_Center,_Play_Area_Inspection_and_Maintenance_Program.pdf

[edit]
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Child_Development_Center,_Play_Area_Inspection_and_Maintenance_Program.pdf has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ices2Csharp (talk) 11:18, 23 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beloves panorama (part of Nachod).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! DimiTalen 07:23, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Deprecated License

[edit]
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Deutsch | English | Italiano | mlyaallN | Portugues | +/-


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Prague Castle and St. Vitus Cathedral around 1860.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 12:38, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Deutsch | English | Italiano | mlyaallN | Portugues | +/-


Hello. Thank you for uploading Image:Prague Castle and St. Vitus Cathedral around 1890.jpg, however the license that you have uploaded it under has been deprecated. Please could you select a new free license that describes the rights of the image correctly? If you are not able to do this, the image will be deleted in 7 days.

For more information on licenses that can be used on Wikimedia Commons, please see Commons:Licensing. If you have any questions, please ask at the village pump. Thank you for your patience and consideration. This is an automatic message by Nikbot.--Filnik 12:38, 22 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Template:Commonist

[edit]
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Template:Commonist has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jarekt (talk) 14:54, 1 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

File:L-159 ALCA Czech Air Force.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:L-159 ALCA Czech Air Force.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

russavia (talk) 18:01, 11 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Category:Featured_pictures_of_architecture

[edit]
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Featured pictures of architecture has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


A.Savin 10:21, 22 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Category:Featured_pictures_of_flowers

[edit]
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Featured pictures of flowers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


A.Savin 10:24, 22 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

[edit]
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 11:05, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last yearReply

File:RQ-4 Global Hawk.ogv

[edit]
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:RQ-4 Global Hawk.ogv has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content--that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans l`rby@ asturianu az@rbaycanca belaruskaia belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) b'lgarski paiuwbhaasaa baaNlaa catala cestina dansk Deutsch Deutsch (Sie-Form) Zazaki Ellenika English espanol euskara frsy suomi francais galego `bryt hindii hrvatski magyar hayeren Bahasa Indonesia italiano Ri Ben Yu hangugeo Letzebuergesch makedonski mlyaallN mraatthii Bahasa Melayu Malti mnmaabhaasaa norsk bokmal Plattduutsch Nederlands norsk nynorsk norsk polski portugues portugues do Brasil romana russkii sicilianu slovencina slovenscina shqip srpski / srpski svenska tmilll toch'iki aithy Turkce ukrayins'ka o`zbekcha / uzbekcha Tieng Viet Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) +/-

Marcus Qwertyus (talk) 18:53, 4 February 2013 (UTC)Reply


Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Commons:Wikidata

[edit]
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Kozuch,

I just see you worked on User:Kozuch/Wikidata. I started Commons:Wikidata, feel free to add to it.

Cheers, Jean-Fred (talk) 16:56, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi Jean-Fred, thanks for a note!--Kozuch (talk) 17:14, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Kindergartenfrankfurt.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Kindergartenfrankfurt.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Avda (talk) 11:45, 9 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 00:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

File:Stoleti ceskeho hokeje 31.JPG

[edit]
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Stoleti ceskeho hokeje 31.JPG has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar (t/p) 13:55, 18 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 22:58, 15 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

[edit]

File:Zoological Exhibition - NM Prague 08.JPG

[edit]
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Zoological Exhibition - NM Prague 08.JPG has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:14, 11 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Category:Czechoslovak_Republic_(1918-1938)

[edit]
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Czechoslovak Republic (1918-1938) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Zoupan (talk) 01:06, 2 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

[edit]
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
l`rby@ belaruskaia belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) b'lgarski catala cestina dansk Deutsch Deutsch (Sie-Form) English espanol frsy suomi francais galego `bryt hindii hrvatski magyar italiano Ri Ben Yu knndd hangugeo makedonski mlyaallN Bahasa Melayu norsk bokmal norsk nynorsk norsk polski portugues portugues do Brasil romana russkii sicilianu slovencina slovenscina svenska tullu Turkce ukrayins'ka Zhong Wen Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) Zhong Wen (Tai Wan ) +/-
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kozuch test 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{self|cc-zero}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:14, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Wiki-cumshot.svg

[edit]
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Wiki-cumshot.svg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

151.51.247.43 10:23, 12 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

File:Kozuch test 2.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
File:Kozuch test 2.jpg has been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated page should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 19:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Prihlaste sve fotky do Czech Wiki Photo 2020!

[edit]
Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Czech Wiki Photo

Mili fotografove a editori projektu Wikimedia,

kazdy rok spolecne nahrajete na Commons tisice svobodnych fotografii. Chceme vam vsem podekovat a take vas ocenit. Vyberte ty nejlepsi z vasich fotek a prihlaste je do 30. 10. 2020 do souteze Czech Wiki Photo 2020! Soutez je otevrena i uplnym novackum. Autori tri nejlepsich fotek si odnesou vouchery do Foto Skoda a specialni wiki-odznaky. Prihlasene fotky bude hodnotit i Honza Rybar, drzitel Czech Press Photo.

Bavi vas foceni pro Commons i mimo souteze? Stante se fotografem Wikimedie, pujcujeme fototechniku a proplacime cesty - vice na Fotime Cesko.

Tesime se na vase snimky!
Za spolek Wikimedia Ceska republika
Jakub Holzer
jakub.holzer@wikimedia.cz -- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:06, 24 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Dotaz na kategorii na Commons

[edit]
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Zdravim,

chtela bych se zeptat na Vasi kategorii na Commons - Category:Museum of Eastern Bohemia in Hradec Kralove exhibitions. Jsem novym koordinatorem projektu GLAM pro WMCR a aktualne zaciname spolupracovat s Muzeem v Hradci Kralove. Mame tam i koordinatora. Zajimalo by me pri jake prilezitosti jste zalozil tuto kategorii, zda jste nejak treba externe spolupracoval s hradeckym muzeem a zda byste pripadne mel zajem zustat se mnou v kontaktu, kdybychom s Hradeckym muzeem poradali nejakou akci nebo treba rozsirovali rezidenstvi?

Dekuji Vam predem za zpravu.

S pranim krasnych svatku, Eva.

Zdravim, ta kategorie je pouze moje soukroma iniciativa (zadna spoluprace atd.), ktera se snazila vyplnit mezeru mezi povolenym focenim v muzeu a absenci fotek z jeho vystav. Koukam, ze ta kategorie predbehla svoji dobu asi tak o 11 let :). Vidim, ze muzeum chce uvolnit sva media na Commons - v jake fazi je jednani o uvolneni tech fotek? Mohu pomoci, ale spis jen online, idealne napriklad kategorizaci jiz po hotovem uploadu, pridanim fotek do clanku, pripadne asi i s uploadem...--Kozuch (talk) 15:15, 1 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Uze open console 12.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Uze open console 12.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content--that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Still image from the movie The Matrix.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans l`rby@ asturianu az@rbaycanca belaruskaia belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) b'lgarski paiuwbhaasaa baaNlaa catala cestina dansk Deutsch Deutsch (Sie-Form) Zazaki Ellenika English espanol euskara frsy suomi francais galego `bryt hindii hrvatski magyar hayeren Bahasa Indonesia italiano Ri Ben Yu hangugeo Letzebuergesch makedonski mlyaallN mraatthii Bahasa Melayu Malti mnmaabhaasaa norsk bokmal Plattduutsch Nederlands norsk nynorsk norsk polski portugues portugues do Brasil romana russkii sicilianu slovencina slovenscina shqip srpski / srpski svenska tmilll toch'iki aithy Turkce ukrayins'ka o`zbekcha / uzbekcha Tieng Viet Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) +/-

TherasTaneel (talk) 13:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

File:Uze open console 07.jpg

[edit]
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Uze open console 07.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content--that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Still image from the movie The Matrix Reloaded.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans l`rby@ asturianu az@rbaycanca belaruskaia belaruskaia (tarashkevitsa) b'lgarski paiuwbhaasaa baaNlaa catala cestina dansk Deutsch Deutsch (Sie-Form) Zazaki Ellenika English espanol euskara frsy suomi francais galego `bryt hindii hrvatski magyar hayeren Bahasa Indonesia italiano Ri Ben Yu hangugeo Letzebuergesch makedonski mlyaallN mraatthii Bahasa Melayu Malti mnmaabhaasaa norsk bokmal Plattduutsch Nederlands norsk nynorsk norsk polski portugues portugues do Brasil romana russkii sicilianu slovencina slovenscina shqip srpski / srpski svenska tmilll toch'iki aithy Turkce ukrayins'ka o`zbekcha / uzbekcha Tieng Viet Zhong Wen (Jian Ti ) Zhong Wen (Fan Ti ) +/-

TherasTaneel (talk) 13:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Category:USS_LEXINGTON_Museum_On_The_Bay

[edit]
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Category:USS_LEXINGTON_Museum_On_The_Bay has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Josh (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Some contents have been nominated for deletion at

This is a deletion request for the community to discuss whether the nominated contents should be kept or deleted. Please voice your opinion in the linked request above. Thank you very much!

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and - if appropriate - contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JopkeB (talk) 16:23, 28 December 2023 (UTC)Reply