57 captures
07 Aug 2008 - 15 Nov 2025
Jun JUL Aug
16
2022 2023 2024
success
fail
About this capture
COLLECTED BY
Organization: Archive Team
Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.

History is littered with hundreds of conflicts over the future of a community, group, location or business that were "resolved" when one of the parties stepped ahead and destroyed what was there. With the original point of contention destroyed, the debates would fall to the wayside. Archive Team believes that by duplicated condemned data, the conversation and debate can continue, as well as the richness and insight gained by keeping the materials. Our projects have ranged in size from a single volunteer downloading the data to a small-but-critical site, to over 100 volunteers stepping forward to acquire terabytes of user-created data to save for future generations.

The main site for Archive Team is at archiveteam.org and contains up to the date information on various projects, manifestos, plans and walkthroughs.

This collection contains the output of many Archive Team projects, both ongoing and completed. Thanks to the generous providing of disk space by the Internet Archive, multi-terabyte datasets can be made available, as well as in use by the Wayback Machine, providing a path back to lost websites and work.

Our collection has grown to the point of having sub-collections for the type of data we acquire. If you are seeking to browse the contents of these collections, the Wayback Machine is the best first stop. Otherwise, you are free to dig into the stacks to see what you may find.

The Archive Team Panic Downloads are full pulldowns of currently extant websites, meant to serve as emergency backups for needed sites that are in danger of closing, or which will be missed dearly if suddenly lost due to hard drive crashes or server failures.

Collection: Archive Team: URLs
TIMESTAMPS
The Wayback Machine - https://web.archive.org/web/20230716102515/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/04/technology/04vista.html
Skip to contentSkip to site index
Technology|Blog Posts Poke Holes in 'Taste Test' by Microsoft
https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/04/technology/04vista.html

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT

Blog Posts Poke Holes in 'Taste Test' by Microsoft

By DAN MITCHELL

SAN FRANCISCO Deserved or not, the Windows Vista operating system from Microsoft gets a bad rap. But the company's recent effort to repair Vista's reputation did not win any rave reviews either.

Last week Microsoft posted videos at MojaveExperiment.com of a test involving about 140 randomly chosen computer users who had low opinions of Vista. These users had no experience with it, so they were shown what was said to be the company's new operating system, called "Mojave." In nearly all the cases, they liked what they saw.

At the end, they were told that "Mojave" was really Vista.

The videos show the shocked reaction. "Wow, really?" many of them said, looking just as surprised as the patrons of America's finest restaurants did in the 1980s TV commercials when the brewed coffee had been replaced by "dark, sparkling, decaffeinated Folgers Crystals."

On the Web, however, many technology bloggers had a different reaction. "Microsoft thinks you're stupid" was the heading of a blog entry on the site of the Canadian magazine Maclean's. The blogger, Colin Campbell, wrote that "Microsoft seems to be shifting blame for its bad P.R. problems over to their customers."

Like the Folgers campaign, the Mojave Experiment is "a clever test that demonstrates nothing," said Bob Garfield, a columnist for Advertising Age magazine and host of "On the Media" on NPR.

Image

If a product has a bad reputation, it is not because of faulty perceptions, Mr. Garfield said. It is because of a faulty product. Vista, halfway through its planned three-year life cycle, has drawn more scorn than most major software products do. People have found it hard to set up. Users have complained that it saps memory and that installing drivers or applications is too difficult.

Microsoft executives have been telling reporters in recent weeks of how much Vista has improved. The company says that with 140 million copies sold, it is Microsoft's fastest-selling operating system. According to Microsoft's internal research, 89 percent of users say they are "very satisfied" or "somewhat satisfied" with the product. Nevertheless, many bloggers had problems with how the Mojave Experiment was conducted. The main complaint was: is 10 minutes of watching an expert demonstrate Vista a valid basis on which to assess it?

One problem with the videos is that many of Vista's glitches have involved setting it up and installing drivers and applications. But in the Mojave Experiment, the software was preloaded, so that aspect of Vista was not tested at all. The site showed "no videos of connecting new devices, attempting to get on a Wi-Fi network, or tunneling into work's V.P.N.," or virtual private network, noted Adam DuVander of Webmonkey, a developers' site.

All these complaints are based on misunderstandings of the Mojave Experiment's purpose, said Ben Carlson, the chief strategy officer for Bradley and Montgomery, the branding firm that conducted the experiment. "It's not about saying Vista is perfect, or that all these people fell in love with it," he said. It was meant to show that "what people have heard about Vista is different from the reality."

The 10-minute demonstration was "a fair representation of the operating system," he said, though he did agree that "an operating system is something you live with." He also said the videos were not the end of the story. "A lot of what people have complained about will be addressed as it evolves," he said. "The experiment will continue."

Microsoft itself declined to comment.

Advertisement

SKIP ADVERTISEMENT